Value of Canadian Building Permits Shrinks in June, Marking Second Consecutive Decline
Building permits, June 2024
On Monday, Statistics Canada (StatCan) reported that the total value of building permits in Canada fell 13.9% to $9.9 billion (CAD) in June, extending the decline observed in May. On a constant dollar basis (2017=100), permits declined 14.3% in June, following a 13.4% decline in May.
Residential
The total value of residential permits decreased 11.5% to $6.5 billion in June. Overall, 9 of the 13 provinces and territories contributed to the decline. Substantial declines in multi-unit construction intentions—down 19.8%, or $937.1 million—led the overall residential decline.
However, intentions in single-family homes increased 4.0% to $2.6 billion.
Canadian municipalities authorized 20,400 dwelling units in June, bringing the total over the last 12 months to 263,400 units.
Nonresidential
The total value of nonresidential permits decreased 18.1% to $3.5 billion in June. The industrial component dropped 42.6%, or $447.2 million, following a 21.3% increase in May. Meanwhile, monthly declines in the commercial component—down 15.6%, or $331.1 million—outweighed modest gains in the institutional component—up 1.0%, or $11.1 million.
Q2 Summary
The total value of building permits in Q2 was $34.6 billion, up 2.1% from $33.9 billion in Q1. This is the second consecutive quarterly increase and the fourth highest quarterly value in the series.
Intentions in the residential sector grew 6.9% to $22.2 billion. Across Canada, 70,200 residential units were authorized in Q2, up 9.1% from Q1.
Overall growth in the value of building permits from Q1 to Q2 was tempered by declines in nonresidential intentions—down 5.6% in Q2, with all three components lower. The industrial component was down 14.8%, or $437.5 million—the largest decline—followed by the commercial component (down 3.0%, or $199.9 million) and the institutional component (down 2.7%, or $95.5 million).
FEA compiles the Wood Markets News from various 3rd party sources to provide readers with the latest news impacting forest product markets. Opinions or views expressed in these articles do not necessarily represent those of FEA.