US Residential Building Materials Costs Decline in July

A closer look at the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Producer Price Index (CPI), with a focus on building materials costs and analysis by the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), reveals that inputs to residential construction, goods less foods and energy, decreased 0.04% in July.

The index for inputs to residential construction, goods less food and energy, represents building materials used in residential construction. Compared to a year ago, the index was up 2.01% in July, marking the sixth straight month above 2% growth. The NAHB notes that just past the midpoint of 2024, the year-to-date increase is 0.47%; this is slightly higher yet similar to the 0.44% increase in same period in 2023.

The product breakdown is as follows:

  • The seasonally adjusted PPI for softwood lumber fell 1.04% in July, after rising 3.29% in June. Softwood lumber prices were 13.12% lower in July 2023.
  • The non-seasonally adjusted PPI for gypsum building materials increased 0.08% in July after no increase in June. Compared to last year, the index was up 4.25%—the highest yearly increase since April 2023, when the index was up 12.14%.
  • The seasonally adjusted PPI for ready-mix concrete rose 0.03% in July after falling 0.15% in June. Monthly growth in prices for ready-mix concrete has been relatively flat for four consecutive months after prices peaked in March. Over the year, ready-mix concrete prices were 5.05% higher in July 2023.
  • The non-seasonally adjusted PPI for steel mill products fell for the second straight month, down 3.29% in July. Steel mill product prices are 13.99% lower than last year. Overall, steel mill product prices have fallen 36.99% since peaking in December of 2021.
  • The non-seasonally adjusted special commodity grouping PPI for copper rose 0.56% in July after falling 2.79% in June. Over the year, the index was up 14.26%.

FEA compiles the Wood Markets News from various 3rd party sources to provide readers with the latest news impacting forest product markets. Opinions or views expressed in these articles do not necessarily represent those of FEA.