University of Michigan Reports Preliminary Results of Its Consumer Sentiment Index for June

The University of Michigan on Friday (6-16-23) released the preliminary results of its Consumer Sentiment Index (CSI) for June:

  • The Index of Consumer Sentiment rose to a reading of 63.9 in June, up from 59.2 in May. This is a month-over-month increase of 7.9% and up 27.8% year-over-year (50.0 in June 2022).
  • The Current Economic Conditions increased to a reading of 68.0, up from 64.9 in May. This is a month-over-month improvement of 4.8% and up 26.4% year-over-year (53.8 in June 2022).
  • The Index of Consumer Expectations climbed to a reading of 61.3 in June, up from 55.4 in May. This is a month-over-month increase of 10.6% and up 29.1% year-over-year (47.5 in June 2022).

In remarks and analysis prepared to accompany the report, Dr. Joanne Hsu, Director of Surveys for the University of Michigan, said:

“Consumer sentiment lifted 8% in June, reaching its highest level in four months, reflecting greater optimism as inflation eased and policymakers resolved the debt ceiling crisis. The outlook over the economy surged 28% over the short run and 14% over the long run. Sentiment is now 28% above the historic low from a year ago and may be resuming its upward trajectory since then. As it stands, though, sentiment remains low by historical standards as income expectations softened. A majority of consumers still expect difficult times in the economy over the next year.

Year-ahead inflation expectations receded for the second consecutive month, falling to 3.3% in June from 4.2% in May. The current reading is the lowest since March 2021. In contrast, long-run inflation expectations were little changed from May at 3.0%, again staying within the narrow 2.9–3.1% range for 22 of the last 23 months. Long-run inflation expectations remained elevated relative to the 2.2–2.6% range seen in the two years pre-pandemic.”


FEA compiles the Wood Markets News from various 3rd party sources to provide readers with the latest news impacting forest product markets. Opinions or views expressed in these articles do not necessarily represent those of FEA.