Goods Used in Residential Construction Climb 1.5% in December

Original Source:
Building Materials Prices Increase 1.5% in December, Lumber Volatility at 75-Year High

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) latest Producer Price Index (PPI), which was released on Thursday (1-13-22) with additional analysis provided by the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), reveals that the price of goods used in residential construction, less energy, climbed 1.5% in December (not seasonally adjusted). The index was driven higher by a significant price increase for wood products.

Building materials prices increased 15.9% in 2021 and have risen 18.6% since December 2020. Since declining -1.8% between July and August 2021, the index has climbed 4.5%. The price index of services inputs to residential construction increased 0.4% in December following a five-month period over which the index declined 13.6%. The index is 9.6% higher than it was 12 months prior and 19.6% higher than the January 2020 reading.

The PPI for softwood lumber (seasonally adjusted) increased 24.4% in December and has gained 44.5% since September. According to Random Lengths data, the “mill price” of framing lumber has roughly tripled since late August.

The NAHB notes that the PPI of most durable goods for a given month is largely based on prices paid for goods shipped, not ordered, in the survey month. This can result in lags relative to cash market prices, suggesting another sizable increase in the softwood lumber producer price index may be in the next PPI report.

Record-high volatility of softwood lumber prices continues to be as problematic as high prices. The monthly change in softwood lumber prices averaged 0.3% between 1947 and 2019. In contrast, the percent change of the index has averaged 12.0% since January 2020 — the highest 24-month average since data first became available 1947 and nearly triple the previous record.

FEA compiles the Wood Markets News from various 3rd party sources to provide readers with the latest news impacting forest product markets. Opinions or views expressed in these articles do not necessarily represent those of FEA.