Canadian Building Permits Decline in December

Statistics Canada (StatsCan) reported today (2-2-22) that the total value of building permits decreased -1.9% to $11.2 billion (CAD) in December. Declines were reported in both the residential and non-residential sectors. On a constant dollar basis (2012=100), the total value of building permits decreased -3.1%.

After a strong showing in November the residential sector experienced a modest setback. The total value of residential permits decreased by -2.7% to $7.7 billion following a strong November (+13.3%). Multi-family permit values declined by -6.0% to $4.1 billion. Construction intentions for single family homes were up 1.3% to $3.6 billion, marking the third consecutive month of gains for this component at the national level.

In the non-residential sector, the total value of non-residential permits remained unchanged at $3.4 billion. In the industrial sector, construction intentions rose 8.4% to $762 million. The value of institutional building permits increased 17.2% to $720 million. Those increases were offset by the total value of commercial permits declining -7.9% to 1.9 billion in December.

For all of Q4 2021, the total value of building permits jumped 10.3% to a new high of $33.1 billion. This surpassed the previous record of $31.5 billion set in Q1 of 2021.

The residential sector in Q4 increased sharply by 11.9% to a record $22.7 billion, contributing almost four-fifths of the overall total building permit value increase. Both permit values for multi-family and single-family components rose strongly compared with Q3, with the multi-family component exceeding $12 billion for the first time.

The non-residential sector rose 7.0% to $10.4 billion in Q4, but it still remains -2.3% below the pre-pandemic peak set in Q4 2019. Commercial permits were up 9.9% to $5.9 billion, while institutional and industrial permits rose 3.1% and 4.0%, respectively.


FEA compiles the Wood Markets News from various 3rd party sources to provide readers with the latest news impacting forest product markets. Opinions or views expressed in these articles do not necessarily represent those of FEA.