Teamsters Canada Rail Conference Members Reauthorize Strikes at CPKC and CN
Members of the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (TCRC) voted to reauthorize strikes at CPKC and CN railways, the union announced on Saturday, according to FreightWaves (7-1-24).
The union represents about 6,000 CN workers and about 3,300 at CPKC. Having been unable to negotiate a deal, the railroads offered binding arbitration, which the railroads rejected. The union proposed staggering the contract talks by two weeks to avoid simultaneous work stoppages, which the railroads also rejected.
Overall, 89.5% of union members participated in the vote, with 98.6% voting to reauthorize the strike, the union said. At CN, conductors, engineers, and yard workers voted 98.4% to authorize the strike, with a 90.1% turnout. At CPKC, that same group voted 99.2% in favor of reauthorization, with an 88.6% turnout. CPKC rail traffic controllers, also represented by the TCRC, voted 95.7% to reauthorize the strike, with an 88.5% turnout.
The union previously authorized strikes at both railroads on May 1st, but those authorizations are only good for 60 days, and the potential May 22nd strikes have been placed on hold while the Canada Industrial Relations Board rules on a government request to determine if any shipments must continue due to safety in the event of a work stoppage. That ruling is still pending.
According to FreightWaves, CPKC said in a Friday statement that it is still awaiting a decision from the Canada Industrial Relations Board and believes “it is unlikely the parties will be in a position to initiate a legal strike or lockout before mid-July or later.” A minimum of 72 hours’ notice is required by law. CPKC said it has asked the CIRB to extend the cooling-off period for 30 days after the board issues its decision to “help provide stability and predictability” regarding a potential work stoppage and “allow all stakeholders to plan for such an eventuality.” The railroad also said its offer of binding arbitration, as well as two collective bargaining proposals, remain on the table.
FEA compiles the Wood Markets News from various 3rd party sources to provide readers with the latest news impacting forest product markets. Opinions or views expressed in these articles do not necessarily represent those of FEA.